Does the USA Need an ASA? — August 14, 2008
Go Michael Phelps.
If Greenwashing were baseball, Royal Dutch Shell would be on the verge of striking out. Twice in less than a year the company has been called on the carpet for misleading eco-advertising, commonly called greenwashing. The first, and don’t ask me how they thought this wasn’t going to make sense to anyone, showed an oil refinery with flowers spewing from the stacks. Nice.

I don’t know the chemistry, biology or whatever is involved in this kind of a deal but it sure sounds like a good thing – why they wouldn’t ship more to greenhouses is beyond me.
Anyways, the ASA ruled that in the absence of qualification the TV ads were misleading and Shell agreed to pull the ad in June of 2007. (Reuters UK)
In a ruling published today, the ASA took issue with Shell’s claims in this print ad that by building what would be the U.S.A.’s largest refinery, and tapping into the Canadian oil sands deposits is somehow environmentally responsible. Yeah, I can see how they would think that would make sense - more oil refineries. Now that is a real sustainable, innovative solution to the energy crisis. 
The text of the ad reads -
“The challenge of the 21st century is to meet the growing need for energy in ways that are not only profitable but sustainable. As our 2007 results show, we’re investing heavily in new technology and assets to safeguard the interests of our shareholders and future generations. In
Difficult to believe, yes. Impossible, yes.
http://www.sattlerclothing.com
Tagged with: • alternative fuels • ASA • greenwashing • Shell






